| Description |
1 online resource (xx, 361 pages) |
|
text txt rdacontent |
|
computer c rdamedia |
|
online resource cr rdacarrier |
| Contents |
The 2014 New Zealand election in perspective -- The fall and rise of inequality in New Zealand -- Electoral behaviour and inequality -- The social foundations of voting behaviour and party funding -- The winner! The National Party, performance and coalition politics -- Still in Labour -- Greening the inequality debate -- Conservatives compared: New Zealand First, ACT and the Conservatives -- The gender dimension of inequality -- Against the tide? Mori in the Mori electorates -- Inequalities in participation -- The unequal election. |
| Summary |
Based on New Zealand Election Study (NZES) data from a sample of 2,830 eligible voters, A Bark But No Bite explores a puzzle. While there was a lot of talk about inequality before the 2014 general election in New Zealand, and during the campaign, concern about inequality appeared to have no tangible effect on the election outcome. This book shows that, by its attention to the concerns of middle ground voters, the National Government had reduced the potential of policy differences to drive voter choices. Perceptions of competence and effective leadership were National's strongest suit, crowding out voter concerns over matters of policy. When voters did consider policy, inequality and related concerns were second to the economy. Traditional priorities about health and education, and perceptions of party differences on these matters, had faded into the background. Meanwhile, voters doubted the opposition Labour Party's ability to govern effectively in an alternative coalition to that of the National-led government. Labour's policies were too many. In various ways, they would have chipped away at inequality, but lacked a coherent narrative and presentation. This book confirms that Labour's proposal to increase the age for receipt of New Zealand superannuation gained Labour no new votes. Hopes that the 'missing million' people who failed to turn out to vote in 2011 would vote in 2014 and give an advantage to the left were unfulfilled. A comprehensive study of the 2014 election, this book provides a detailed account of all these findings, and a host of others. |
| Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 281-334). |
| Access |
Open Access EbpS |
| Subject |
New Zealand. Parliament -- Elections, 2014.
|
|
New Zealand. Parliament
|
|
Elections -- New Zealand.
|
|
New Zealand -- Politics and government -- 21st century.
|
|
Élections -- Nouvelle-Zélande.
|
|
Nouvelle-Zélande -- Politique et gouvernement -- 21e siècle.
|
|
POLITICAL SCIENCE / Public Policy / General.
|
|
Elections
|
|
Politics and government
|
|
New Zealand https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39QbtfRmXBg7mpKX7p4DJ8Kqp
|
| Chronological Term |
2000-2099
|
| Added Author |
Coffé, Hilde, author.
|
|
Curtin, Jennifer, author.
|
|
Australian National University Press.
|
| Other Form: |
Print version: 9781760461355 1760461350 (OCoLC)990329230 |
| ISBN |
1760461369 |
|
9781760461355 |
|
1760461350 |
|
9781760461362 (electronic bk.) |
| Standard No. |
AU@ 000060076215 |
|
AU@ 000061498190 |
|
GBVCP 1008668834 |
|
