Kids Library Home

Welcome to the Kids' Library!

Search for books, movies, music, magazines, and more.

     
Available items only
Record 36 of 4505
Previous Record Next Record
E-Book/E-Doc
Corporate Author United States. Government Accountability Office, issuing body.

Title 2013 sequestration [electronic resource] : agencies reduced some services and investments, while taking certain actions to mitigate effects : report to the Chairman, Committee on the Budget, House of Representatives.

Publication Info. [Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2014.

Copies

Location Call No. OPAC Message Status
 Axe Federal Documents Online  GA 1.13:GAO-14-244    ---  Available
Description 1 online resource (v, 216 pages) : color illustrations
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
text file PDF rda
Note "March 2014."
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references.
Contents Background -- Agencies' actions in response to sequestration resulted in a range of immediate and longer-term effects -- Most agencies began formal planning for sequestration in 2012 while continued uncertainty delayed decisions regarding resource allocation -- Agencies used funding flexibilities and Congress took actions to mitigate some effects on core mission while still achieving sequestration reductions -- Conclusions -- Recommendations for executive action -- Agency comments and our evaluation -- Overview of sequestration at 23 federal agencies.
Summary On March 1, 2013, pursuant to the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the President ordered an across-the-board cancellation of budgetary resources -- known as sequestration -- to achieve $85.3 billion in reductions across federal government accounts. GAO was asked to evaluate how agencies prepared for and implemented sequestration. This report examines (1) the effects of fiscal year 2013 sequestration on agency operations, performance, or services to the public; (2) how agencies prepared and planned for sequestration; and (3) how agencies implemented sequestration. GAO collected standard information from and interviewed chief financial officers or their designee in 23 federal agencies and OMB, and reviewed documents when available to corroborate the information reported. GAO did not assess the appropriateness of actions taken.
Note Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (GAO, viewed March 7, 2014).
Subject Sequestration (Public finance) -- United States.
Administrative agencies -- United States -- Finance.
Administrative agencies -- United States -- Management.
Added Author United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Budget, sponsoring body.
Added Title Agencies reduced some services and investments, while taking certain actions to mitigate effects
Gpo Item No. 0546-D (online)
Sudoc No. GA 1.13:GAO-14-244

 
    
Available items only