Kids Library Home

Welcome to the Kids' Library!

Search for books, movies, music, magazines, and more.

     
Available items only
Print Material
Author Osiel, Mark, author.

Title The right to do wrong : morality and the limits of law / Mark Osiel.

Publication Info. Cambridge, Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 2019.
©2019

Copies

Location Call No. OPAC Message Status
 Axe 3rd Floor Stacks  340.112 Os4r 2019    ---  Available
1 copy being processed for Axe Acquisitions Order.
Description 502 pages ; 25 cm
text txt rdacontent
unmediated n rdamedia
volume nc rdacarrier
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references (429-489) and index.
Contents Introduction : Defining the puzzle -- Common morality, social mores, and the law -- A sampling of rights to do wrong -- Three rights to do wrong -- How to "abuse" a right -- Law and morality in ordinary language and social science -- Divergences of law and morals : sites and sources -- Convergences of law and morals : sites and sources -- Questions of method and meaning : the law at odds with common morality -- Why this book is not what you had in mind -- The changing stance of lawyers towards common morality -- Commercial morality, bourgeois virtue, and the law -- How we attach responsibilities to rights -- Common morality confronts modernity.
Summary The law sometimes permits what ordinary morality, or widely-shared notions of right and wrong, reproaches. The Right to Do Wrong explores the relationship between law and common morality to clarify law's reliance on society's broad presumption that people will exercise their rights responsibly. More concretely, Osiel argues that certain legal rights rest on tacit sociological assumptions as to who will exercise them, under what circumstances, and how frequently. Further, he argues that we depend on stigma and shame to reduce and circumscribe the law's use. Some examples: though reneging on a debt is considered wrong, the law allows you to declare personal bankruptcy; international law allows museums to retain some masterworks looted from their rightful owners; in many countries abortion is permitted as a means of birth control. Using these examples and more, Osiel presents a "social scientific" analysis of law's interaction with social mores and the extent to which they limit our exercising rights to do wrong. The paradox he intends to elucidate is when and why it is appropriate for societies to champion de jure entitlements even as they successfully limit their de facto usage.-- Provided by publisher.
Subject Law and ethics.
Law and ethics. (OCoLC)fst00993904
ISBN 9780674368255 hardcover ; alkaline paper
0674368258 hardcover ; alkaline paper

 
    
Available items only