Description |
1 online resource (16 pages) : color illustration |
|
text txt rdacontent |
|
computer c rdamedia |
|
online resource cr rdacarrier |
|
text file |
|
PDF |
Series |
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission staff research report |
|
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission staff research report.
|
Note |
"July 26, 2017." |
Bibliography |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 11-16). |
Contents |
Executive summary. -- Background, what is THAAD? The deployment of THAAD. -- China's stated concerns about THAAD. -- China's economic coercion and other measures directed against South Korea. -- Implications for the United States and the geopolitical landscape in the Asia Pacific. -- Appendix. |
Summary |
Beijing perceives THAAD as mostly directed at China and as a regional security concern, according to its official statements. Chinese observers claim the THAAD deployment signals the expansion of the U.S.-allied ballistic missile defense architecture in the Asia Pacific, weakens China's nuclear deterrent, and confirms longstanding fears of U.S. containment of China. Beijing has used economic coercion, among other tools, to try to compel Seoul to abandon the THAAD deployment. These levers used against South Korean businesses, groups, and individuals reflect a Chinese government pattern of adverse actions toward other countries it perceives as defying or undermining China's national security interests, although the Chinese economic coercion against South Korea is greater in scope and depth. China's forceful opposition to THAAD has significant implications for the United States and the geopolitical landscape in the Asia Pacific. These implications include: China's potential use of economic coercion against other countries during future disputes; the potential use of Chinese countermeasures to overcome the U.S.-led regional missile defense network; increased Chinese missile defense coordination with Russia; additional complications in coordinating U.S. policy toward North Korea with allies and partners in the Asia Pacific; and potential improvements in U.S.-South Korea-Japan cooperation. |
Note |
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (USCC, viewed April 26, 2021). |
Subject |
Ballistic missile defenses -- Korea (South)
|
|
Air defenses -- Korea (South)
|
|
United States -- Military relations -- Korea (South)
|
|
Korea (South) -- Military relations -- United States.
|
|
China -- Foreign relations -- Korea (South)
|
|
China -- Foreign economic relations -- Korea (South)
|
|
Security, International -- East Asia.
|
|
China -- Military policy.
|
|
Military relations. (OCoLC)fst01353799
|
|
Air defenses. (OCoLC)fst00802341
|
|
Ballistic missile defenses. (OCoLC)fst00826083
|
|
Diplomatic relations. (OCoLC)fst01907412
|
|
International economic relations. (OCoLC)fst00976891
|
|
Military policy. (OCoLC)fst01021386
|
|
Security, International. (OCoLC)fst01110895
|
|
United States. (OCoLC)fst01204155
|
|
China. (OCoLC)fst01206073
|
|
East Asia. (OCoLC)fst01243628
|
|
Korea (South) (OCoLC)fst01206791
|
Added Author |
Salidjanova, Nargiza, author.
|
|
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, issuing body.
|
Added Title |
China's response to United States-South Korean missile defense system deployment and its implications |
Gpo Item No. |
1089-A-11 (online) |
Sudoc No. |
Y 3.2:C 44/M 69/2 |