Kids Library Home

Welcome to the Kids' Library!

Search for books, movies, music, magazines, and more.

     
Available items only
E-Book/E-Doc

Title Comparison of a typical electronic attitude-direction indicator with terrain-depicting primary flight displays for performing recoveries from unknown attitudes [electronic resource] : using difference and equivalence tests : final report / Dennis B. Beringer [and others].

Imprint Washington, D.C. : Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine ; Ft. Belvior, Va. : Available to the public through the Defense Technical Information Center ; Springfield, Va. : Available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, 2005.

Copies

Location Call No. OPAC Message Status
 Axe Federal Documents Online  TD 4.210:05/23    ---  Available
Description iii, 7 pages : digital, PDF file
text txt rdacontent
computer c rdamedia
online resource cr rdacarrier
System Details Mode of access; Internet from the Office of Aerospace Medicine web site.
Note Title from title screen (viewed on Oct. 10, 2006).
Funding Performed by the FAA Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK and School of Industrial Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK under approved task no. AHRR521
Note "December 2005."
Summary A study was conducted to determine if primary flight displays (PFDs) depicting terrain could be used with a level of safety equivalent to electronic attitude-direction indicators (EADIs) without terrain. Five groups of 8 pilots each flew scenarios in a flight simulator using one of three PFDs (EADI, full-color terrain, uniformly brown terrain) with or without guidance cues. Performances of recoveries from unknown attitudes using the EADI were measured first as a baseline, followed by trials with one of the experimental formats. Performance measures included initial response time, total recovery time, and both initial and secondary control reversals. Traditional "difference" analyses found no significant performance differences between groups. Analyses using confidence intervals to assess equivalence of distributions showed that group performances were practically equivalent. Pilot preferences were examined and are reported. It was concluded that the specific terrain representations examined provided for performance at least equal to if not better than the conventional EADI. This comparative technique is recommended for situations in which one wishes to demonstrate that a proposed device or system is no worse than or roughly equivalent to something already in use.
Bibliography Includes bibliographical references (page 7).
Note "DOT/FAA/AM-05/23."
Subject Aeronautical instruments -- Display systems -- Evaluation.
Aeronautics -- Safety measures.
Aeronautical instruments -- Display systems -- Evaluation. (OCoLC)fst00798276
Aeronautics -- Safety measures. (OCoLC)fst00798382
Added Author Beringer, Dennis B. (Dennis Bruce), 1950-
United States. Office of Aerospace Medicine.
United States. Federal Aviation Administration.
Civil Aerospace Medical Institute.
University of Oklahoma. School of Industrial Engineering.
Added Title Using difference and equivalence tests
Other Form: Comparison of a typical electronic attitude-direction indicator with terrain-depicting primary flight displays for performing recoveries from unknown attitudes iii, 7 p. (OCoLC)63131116
Standard No. AU@ 000042069918
Gpo Item No. 0431-E-04 (online)
Sudoc No. TD 4.210:05/23

 
    
Available items only