| Description |
1 online resource (14 pages) : color illustrations. |
|
text txt rdacontent |
|
computer c rdamedia |
|
online resource cr rdacarrier |
| Series |
NREL/PR ; 5100-82694 |
|
NREL/PR ; 5100-82694.
|
| Note |
Slideshow presentation. |
|
In scope of the U.S. Government Publishing Office Cataloging and Indexing Program (C&I) and Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP). |
|
"TCBiomass, April 21st, 2022." |
| Funding |
DE-AC36-08GO28308 |
| Note |
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (NREL, viewed October 25, 2022). |
| Summary |
Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis (CFP) of biomass provides an opportunity for producing stabilized bio-oils (CFP oils) that can be further processed into hydrocarbon transportation fuels via hydroprocessing. Standalone hydrotreating of CFP oils has been pursued and has been shown to be able to produce hydrocarbon products with low oxygen contents of <1wt%, but the process is costly due to the high requirements of hydrogen and high capital costs. The costs can be reduced by co-processing in refineries, which takes advantage of the existing refinery infrastructure and the economies of the larger scale of petroleum processing operations. In this contribution, we evaluated co-hydrotreating of CFP oil with straight-run diesel in a laboratory continuous hydrotreating reactor. The CFP oil had been produced over a bi-functional metal-acid catalyst (Pt/TiO2) and contained 17 wt% oxygen on dry basis, and it was fed to the reactor together with straight-run diesel in the proportion of 20 vol%:80 vol%. The co-hydrotreated diesel products had acceptable cetane numbers (>40), and the calculated carbon efficiencies were high (~95%) for the CFP portion of the feed mixtures. Biogenic carbon incorporation in the product was confirmed by C-14 analysis. Sulfided NiMo catalyst gave better performance with respect to the diesel product quality than CoMo did due to the higher hydrogenation activity of NiMo. A comparison of standalone hydrotreating of the CFP oil and the straight-run diesel to co-hydrotreating showed good correspondence. Major challenges and risks associated with co-hydrotreating are discussed in this presentation. |
| Subject |
Pyrolysis.
|
|
Hydrotreating catalysts.
|
|
Petroleum refineries -- United States.
|
|
Forest biomass -- United States.
|
|
Pyrolyse.
|
|
Pétrole -- Raffineries -- États-Unis.
|
|
Biomasse forestière -- États-Unis.
|
|
pyrolysis.
|
|
Forest biomass
|
|
Hydrotreating catalysts
|
|
Petroleum refineries
|
|
Pyrolysis
|
|
United States https://id.oclc.org/worldcat/entity/E39PBJtxgQXMWqmjMjjwXRHgrq
|
| Indexed Term |
biomass |
|
catalytic fast pyrolysis |
|
co-hydrotreating |
|
hydrotreating |
|
NiMo |
|
straight run diesel |
| Added Author |
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (U.S.), issuing body.
|
|
United States. Department of Energy. Bioenergy Technologies Office, sponsoring body.
|
| Standard No. |
0000-0003-1326-901X |
|
0000-0002-3919-7977 |
|
0000-0003-4258-7287 |
|
0000-0003-2189-5678 |
| Gpo Item No. |
0430-P-09 (online) |
| Sudoc No. |
E 9.22:NREL/PR-5100-82694 |
|
