Welcome to the Kids' Library!

The 21st century Army : roles, missions, and functions in an age of information and uncertainty.

Ann Arbor, Mich. : Vector Research, Inc. ; [Washington, D.C.? : U.S. Army, 1995?] 1995

The 31 initiatives : a study in Air Force-Army cooperation

Davis, Richard G.
Washington, D.C. : Office of Air Force History, U.S. Air Force, 1987. 1987

Aerospace defense of North America

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [1996] 1996

AFRICOM at 5 years the maturation of a new U.S. combatant command

Brown, David E. (David Edward), author.
Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2013. 2013

Air Force basic doctrine, organization, and command Air Force doctrine document 1, 14 October 2011.

United States. Department of the Air Force.
[Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : LeMay Center for Doctrine Development, 2011] 2011

Air National Guard structure for the twenty-first century the multimission framework for total force

Dailey, Kevin S.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air University Press, [2008] 2008

Airpower, Afghanistan, and the future of warfare an alternative view

Wills, Craig D.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air University Press, [2006] 2006

Airpower in the context of a dysfunctional joint doctrine

Pivarsky, Carl R.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air War College, Air University, [1997] 1997

Allied command structures in the new NATO

[Fort McNair, Washington, D.C.] : Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, 1997. 1997

Always strategic : jointly essential landpower

Gray, Colin S., author.
Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute and U.S. Army War College Press, 2015. 2015

Amphibious operations : hearing before the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces of the Com

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces.
Washington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 2011. 2011

The Army’s AimPoint and Army 2030 Force Structure Initiatives

Feickert, Andrew, author.
[Washington, D.C.] : Congressional Research Service, 2020- 2020

Army multi-domain transformation : ready to win in competition and conflict.

United States. Department of the Army, author.
[Washington, DC] : Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2021. 2021

The Army's role in overcoming anti-access and area of denial challenges

Gordon, John, 1956- author.
Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corporation, 2013. 2013

Battle management : DOD and Air Force continue to define joint command and control efforts : report

United States. Government Accountability Office, author, issuing body.
Washington, DC : United States Government Accountability Office, 2023. 2023

Capstone concept for special operations

[MacDill Air Force Base, Fla.] : U.S. Special Operations Command, 2006. 2006

The case for Army XXI "medium weight" aero-motorized divisions a pathway to the army of 2020

Gordon, John, 1956-
Carlisle, PA : Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, [1998] 1998

Cleared to engage improving joint close air support effectiveness

Johnson, Michael H.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air University Press, [2008] 2008

The collaborative fight : pursuing jointness in the U.S. military

Birch, Paul R., author.
Lawrence, Kansas : University Press of Kansas, [2024] 2024

Combat air power joint assessment of air superiority can be improved : report to congressional commi

United States. General Accounting Office.
Washington, D.C. : The Office ; Gaithersburg, MD (P.O. Box 6015, Gaithersburg 20884-6015) : The Office [distributor, 1997] 1997

Combat air power joint mission assessments needed before making program and budget decisions : repor

United States. General Accounting Office.
Washington, DC : U.S. General Accounting Office, [1996] 1996

The combat cloud : enabling multidomain command and control across the range of military operations

Hess, Jacob, author
Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama : Air University Press, Curtis E. LeMay Center for Doctrine Development and Education, 2019. 2019

Combat pair the evolution of Air Force-Navy integration in strike warfare

Lambeth, Benjamin S.
Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corp., c2007. 2007

Combat pair : the evolution of Air Force-Navy integration in strike warfare

Lambeth, Benjamin S.
Santa Monica, CA : RAND Corp., ©2007. 2007

Command and control for joint air operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [2003] 2003

Command and control for joint land operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [2004] 2004

Commentary on "The US Army in multi-domain operations 2028"

Wass de Czege, Huba, author.
[Carlisle, Pa.] : U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, 2020. 2020

A comparative look at air-ground support doctrine and practice in World War II with an appendix on c

Steadman, Kenneth A.
[Fort Leavenworth, Kan.] : Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, [1982] 1982

A cooperative strategy for 21st century seapower

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services.
Washington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O., 2009. 2009

The counterair companion short guide to air superiority for joint force commanders

Holmes, James M. (James Michael)
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air University Press, [1995] 1995

Cyberspace operations

[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Air Force, [2010] 2010

Defense acquisitions DOD's requirements determination process has not been effective in prioritizing

United States. Government Accountability Office.
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2008] 2008

Defense headquarters DOD needs to reassess options for permanent location of U.S. Africa Command : r

United States. Government Accountability Office, issuing body.
[Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2013. 2013

Defense headquarters DOD needs to periodically review and improve visibility of combatant commands'

United States. Government Accountability Office, author, issuing body.
[Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2013. 2013

Defense logistics efforts to improve distribution and supply support for joint military operations c

United States. Government Accountability Office.
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2007] 2007

Defense management U.S. Southern Command demonstrates interagency collaboration, but Its Haiti disas

United States. Government Accountability Office.
[Washington, D.C.] : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, [2010] 2010

Defense plans status of DOD's efforts to improve its joint warfighting requirements process.

Schuster, Carol R.
Washington, DC : U.S. General Accounting Office, [2001] 2001

Defense primer: Army multi-domain operations (MDO)

Feickert, Andrew, author.
[Washington, D.C.] : Congressional Research Service, 2020- 2020

Defining U.S. Atlantic Command's role in the power projection strategy

Lovelace, Douglas C.
Carlisle Barracks, Pa. : Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College, [1998] 1998

Department of Homeland Security opportunities exist to enhance visibility over collaborative field m

United States. Government Accountability Office, issuing body.
[Washington, D.C.] : United States Government Accountability Office, 2013. 2013

Developing doctrine for the future joint force creating synergy and minimizing seams

Brown, Charles Q.
Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala. : Air University Press, [2005] 2005

Doctrinal implications of low collateral damage capabilities

Suffolk, VA : Joint Warfighting Center, U.S. Joint Forces Command, [2003] 2003

Doctrinal implications of the Standing Joint Force Headquarters (SJFHQ)

Joint Warfighting Center (U.S.)
Suffolk, VA : Joint Warfighting Center, U.S. Joint Forces Command, [2003] 2003

Doctrine for health service support in joint operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [2001] 2001

Doctrine for intelligence support to joint operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [2000] 2000

Doctrine for joint combat search and rescue

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [1996] 1996

Doctrine for joint fire support.

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [1998] 1998

Doctrine for joint interdiction operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [1997] 1997

Doctrine for joint nuclear operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [1995] 1995

Doctrine for joint operations

United States. Joint Chiefs of Staff.
[Washington, D.C.] : Joint Chiefs of Staff, [2001] 2001