Welcome to the Kids' Library!

Search for books, movies, music, magazines, and more.

Back to Search Results

Available items only

Previous Record Next Record

Author

Pernin, Christopher G., 1973-

Title Readiness reporting for a different Army / Christopher G. Pernin, Dwayne M. Butler, Louay Constant, Lily Geyer, Duncan Long, Dan Madden, John E. Peters, Jim Powers, Michael Shurkin.

Publication Info.	Santa Monica, CA : RAND, [2013]
	©2013

Connect to
Connect to https://pittstate.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/j.ctt5hhvmf

Copies

Location	Call No.	OPAC Message	Status
Axe JSTOR Open Ebooks	Electronic Book	---	Available

Description	1 online resource (xxiii, 139 pages) : color illustrations
	text txt rdacontent
	computer c rdamedia
	online resource cr rdacarrier
	text file
	PDF
Series	RAND Corporation research report series ; RR230
	Research report (Rand Corporation) ; RR230.
Bibliography	Includes bibliographical references (pages 131-139).
Contents	Introduction. -- Building new capabilities and readiness reporting. -- Exploring the value of the MTOE for readiness reporting. -- From readiness to capabilities: ready for what? -- Transitioning to the future and recommendations. -- Appendix A. Literature -- Appendix B. Selected rapid capability organizations -- Appendix C. MTOE scrubs -- Appendix D. Framework for considering root causes of assigned missions.
Summary	The Army has developed an impressive capacity to adapt to emerging requirements by providing units with new capabilities rapidly and flexibly as units prepare for deployment through the Army Force Generation (ARFORGEN) process. The Army's ability to report on readiness throughout these adaptations, however, is challenged. The readiness reporting system is largely predicated on a bottom-up, deliberate process with known milestones and pre-determined designs to which the Army would build readiness. As those targets are changed, for instance when deploying to a changing operational environment as was seen in Iraq and Afghanistan, the reporting system cannot easily keep up. The key challenge to readiness reporting is that Army units now routinely prepare for assigned missions that sometimes differ in meaningful ways from their designed missions. This study examines the Army's readiness reporting system in light of the increased adaptiveness demonstrated by Army units in the past decade. In this study we found that while the readiness reporting system still works as originally intended, the current readiness reporting system captures only a portion of the adaptations readily seen in recent years. The study offers recommendations to better reflect these adaptations in the readiness reporting system.
Note	Online resource; title from PDF title page (RAND, viewed October 20, 2013).
Funding	The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. W74V8H-06-C-0001.
Language	English.
Subject	United States. Army -- Operational readiness -- Evaluation.
	United States. Army -- Reorganization -- Evaluation.
	États-Unis. Army -- État de préparation opérationnelle -- Évaluation.
	États-Unis. Army -- Réorganisation -- Évaluation.
	United States. Army
	TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING -- Military Science.
Added Author	Arroyo Center.
	Rand Corporation.
ISBN	9780833083753 (electronic bk.)
	0833083759 (electronic bk.)
	9780833080325
	0833080326
Standard No.	AU@ 000061153606
	GBVCP 1008659711